Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

HR Tech SaaS may earn a commission when you buy through links on this page. Our recommendations are editorial and never paid for.
The best HR software for US nonprofits includes Gusto, Rippling, BambooHR, OnPay, ADP Workforce Now, Paycor, Paylocity, HR Partner, TriNet HR Platform (formerly Zenefits), and Namely. Each fits a different nonprofit size and funding structure. OnPay and Gusto are the strongest entry-level options for small 501(c)(3)s that need nonprofit-aware payroll without enterprise pricing. Rippling and Paycor serve mid-size nonprofits that need more module depth.
Nonprofits do not run HR the way corporations do. They allocate staff time across multiple grants, manage a mix of full-time employees and volunteers, and answer to boards and auditors who need clean fund-level reporting. Standard HRIS platforms are built around a single cost center per employee. That assumption breaks down the moment a program director splits her time across three federal grants.
The other common gap is payroll tax treatment. 501(c)(3) organizations are exempt from paying Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) taxes, and many states offer parallel UI exemptions. A payroll platform that does not know how to handle those exemptions will either overcharge you or flag errors constantly. The IRS is explicit that 501(c)(3) organizations are exempt from FUTA , yet many payroll tools default to taxable status unless you specifically configure them.
Budget constraints are real, but they are not the whole story. A $6 per employee per month platform that requires a $5,000 implementation engagement and three add-on modules is not actually cheaper than an $8 PEPM all-in platform. Before you shortlist, build a 24-month total cost model. Our guide on hidden costs of HR software covers implementation fees, integration costs, and per-employee pricing traps that catch buyers off guard.
Grant-funded organizations have four requirements that most buyers underweight during demos.
The table below gives you a quick orientation before the full reviews. Pricing shown is from each vendor’s public pricing page as of the time of writing; quote-only vendors are marked accordingly.
| Platform | Best For | Payroll Included | Starting Price (PEPM) | Nonprofit Discount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gusto | Small nonprofits, 5-100 employees | Yes | $40/mo + $6 PEPM (Simple) | Ask directly |
| OnPay | Small nonprofits needing clean payroll | Yes | $40/mo + $6 PEPM | No formal program |
| Rippling | Mid-size nonprofits, 50-500 employees | Add-on | Quote-only (starts ~$8 PEPM) | Negotiable |
| BambooHR | Mid-size nonprofits, HRIS-first | Add-on | Quote-only | Available |
| ADP Workforce Now | Larger nonprofits, 100+ employees | Yes | Quote-only | Via TechSoup |
| Paycor | Mid-market nonprofits, compliance-heavy | Yes | Quote-only | Ask directly |
| Paylocity | Mid-market nonprofits, engagement focus | Yes | Quote-only | Negotiable |
| HR Partner | Small nonprofits wanting HRIS without payroll | No | From $55/mo (up to 10 employees) | Nonprofit pricing available |
| TriNet HR Platform (formerly Zenefits) | Small-mid nonprofits, benefits focus | Add-on | Quote-only | Ask directly |
| Namely | Mid-market nonprofits, 50-500 employees | Yes | Quote-only | Negotiable |

Gusto is the most practical starting point for small nonprofits. It handles FUTA exemption correctly when you register as a 501(c)(3), manages state tax filings in all 50 states, and does not require a dedicated HR person to run it. The interface is clean enough that a part-time operations manager can process payroll without payroll experience.
Where Gusto falls short for nonprofits is cost allocation. It does not natively split labor costs across grant codes. You will need to export payroll data to QuickBooks or Sage Intacct and do that allocation in your accounting software. That is a manageable workaround for organizations under 50 employees, but it adds manual steps.
Gusto’s public pricing starts at $40 per month plus $6 per employee per month on the Simple plan. The Plus and Premium tiers add HR features and dedicated support. For nonprofits, it is worth calling their sales team and asking directly about mission-driven discounts , the answer varies by account rep.

OnPay is the strongest payroll-first option for small nonprofits and one of the few platforms that explicitly markets itself to 501(c)(3) organizations. OnPay’s nonprofit payroll page notes that it handles FUTA exemptions, state unemployment tax (SUTA) exemptions where applicable, and the pay structures common in mission-driven organizations, including ministers’ housing allowances for religious nonprofits.
The pricing is flat and predictable: $40 per month plus $6 per employee per month, all features included. There are no premium tiers that lock off compliance features. For a 20-person nonprofit, that is $160 per month for full-service payroll, HR document storage, and onboarding tools.
OnPay does not have a deep HRIS. If you need performance management, org charts, or benefits administration beyond basic health insurance, you will need a separate tool alongside it. Treat OnPay as payroll infrastructure and pair it with HR Partner or BambooHR if you need more.

Rippling is the platform to consider when your nonprofit has grown past 50 employees and is running into the limits of simpler tools. It handles multi-state payroll, benefits, device management, and app provisioning on a single platform, which reduces the number of vendors a lean HR team has to manage.
The cost allocation gap that hurts Gusto and OnPay is smaller with Rippling because of its deeper accounting integrations and custom reporting. You still need a finance-side system for true grant accounting, but Rippling gets you closer to usable payroll data exports by department and cost center.
Pricing is quote-only. The base platform starts around $8 per employee per month according to widely reported estimates, but modules are additive. A nonprofit buying payroll, HRIS, and benefits administration will pay more than that base. Negotiate hard. Rippling’s sales teams have room to move, especially for multi-year contracts. If you are comparing Rippling against its closest competitors, our Rippling alternatives comparison covers the trade-offs in depth.

BambooHR has an explicit nonprofit offering. Their website markets directly to nonprofits and offers pricing concessions for qualifying organizations. The platform is HRIS-first: employee records, onboarding, offboarding, performance reviews, and eNPS surveys are strong. Payroll is an add-on that is US-only and works well for most small-to-mid nonprofits.
BambooHR’s nonprofit strength is ease of use. HR generalists and office managers at nonprofits adopt it without much training, which matters when your HR team is one person wearing five hats. The reporting suite is solid enough to pull headcount and turnover data for board presentations.
The weakness is integration depth. If your nonprofit runs Blackbaud Raiser’s Edge for fundraising or uses a specialized volunteer management platform, BambooHR’s integration options are narrower than Rippling’s. You will likely need Zapier or a manual export process.

ADP is the incumbent for larger nonprofits, particularly those with 100 or more employees that need enterprise-grade compliance support. ADP Workforce Now handles multi-state payroll, benefits administration, time and attendance, and ACA reporting. The compliance infrastructure is mature in a way that newer platforms cannot fully match.
The nonprofit angle with ADP runs primarily through TechSoup, which has offered ADP product discounts to verified 501(c)(3) organizations. Check TechSoup’s current catalog before negotiating directly with ADP, as the TechSoup route can offer meaningful savings.
ADP’s weakness for nonprofits is the same as its weakness for anyone: the interface is dated, implementation takes longer than competitors advertise, and the support experience is inconsistent depending on which service tier you land on. It is a solid back-office choice for a well-resourced nonprofit. It is not the right tool for a 15-person advocacy organization.

Paycor sits in the mid-market payroll-plus-HR category alongside Paylocity and Paycom. It covers payroll, benefits administration, recruiting, onboarding, time tracking, and analytics in one platform. Compliance is a core selling point: Paycor’s compliance alerts and audit tools are genuinely useful for nonprofits navigating multistate employment law.
Paycor does not publish pricing. The platform works best for nonprofits in the 50-to-300 employee range that want to consolidate vendors and reduce the number of manual data transfers their HR team runs each month.
Paycor’s nonprofit-specific messaging is less developed than BambooHR’s, but the underlying platform handles 501(c)(3) payroll configuration and FUTA exemptions correctly. Ask specifically about nonprofit references during your sales process to get a realistic picture of how similar organizations have deployed it.

Paylocity is a strong mid-market alternative to Paycor, with a notable edge in employee experience features. The Community module (an internal social network), peer recognition tools, and engagement surveys make Paylocity worth considering for nonprofits where culture and mission alignment are central to retention. Nonprofit staff often accept below-market pay because they believe in the work. Paylocity’s engagement tools can support that.
Payroll, time tracking, and benefits administration are all solid. The analytics module gives HR managers and executive directors clean dashboards for board reporting without requiring data exports to a separate tool.
Like Paycor, pricing is quote-only. Paylocity’s per-employee cost is generally competitive with Paycor in the same size range, but the engagement-focused modules can push costs up if you want the full suite.

HR Partner is a lightweight, affordable HRIS built with smaller organizations in mind, and it explicitly includes nonprofits in its marketing. It handles employee records, leave management, document storage, onboarding checklists, and basic reporting. It does not do payroll, which makes it a pairing candidate with OnPay or Gusto.
Pricing starts at $55 per month for up to 10 employees and scales by headcount. HR Partner offers nonprofit pricing for qualifying organizations. The platform also surfaces on TechSoup as a recommended nonprofit HR tool.
For a 20-to-40 person nonprofit that just needs a single source of truth for employee records and does not want to pay for modules it will never use, HR Partner is underrated. It is not a platform you will scale to 200 employees, but it solves the core record-keeping problem cleanly and affordably.

TriNet HR Platform covers benefits administration, payroll, time tracking, and compliance under one roof. Benefits is historically its strongest module: the platform simplifies health insurance enrollment and ACA reporting in ways that save time for small HR teams. The product has gone through meaningful consolidation since TriNet acquired Zenefits, and the current platform is best evaluated on its own merits rather than its predecessor’s reputation. Run a current demo before forming a view.
For nonprofits, the benefits administration angle matters. Many small nonprofits struggle to offer competitive health benefits on constrained budgets. TriNet HR Platform’s benefits marketplace can help HR managers benchmark options without a broker on retainer.
Pricing is quote-based. It works best for nonprofits in the 20-to-150 employee range that want benefits administration to be the centerpiece of their HR stack.

Namely targets mid-market companies between 50 and 500 employees and covers payroll, benefits, time, onboarding, and performance in an integrated platform. The interface is modern and positions itself as a mid-market alternative to Workday and UKG without enterprise pricing or enterprise implementation timelines.
Namely is a reasonable choice for a nonprofit that has outgrown Gusto or BambooHR but is not ready for ADP’s complexity. The platform integrates with common accounting systems and has solid reporting for organizations that need monthly headcount and labor cost summaries for grant reporting purposes.
Namely is quote-only on pricing. It is not the loudest nonprofit-specific voice in the market, but it handles the basics competently and scales reasonably. Request a nonprofit reference customer during the sales process.
Some nonprofits skip standalone HR software entirely and go with a Professional Employer Organization. A PEO co-employs your staff, handles payroll taxes, provides benefits at group rates, and absorbs some HR liability. For a nonprofit with under 30 employees and no dedicated HR person, a PEO can be cheaper and simpler than building an HR stack from scratch.
The trade-off is control. A PEO makes you a co-employer, which means their policies and plan options apply to your organization. That can be a problem for nonprofits with specific benefits philosophy or unusual pay structures tied to grant budgets. If you want to understand when to move from a PEO to a standalone HRIS, our comparison of Justworks alternatives covers that transition in practical terms.
This is the question most HR software vendors cannot answer cleanly. Grant-funded nonprofits are often required by funders to show what percentage of each employee’s time was spent on grant-funded activities. That means payroll needs to connect to your fund accounting system at a granular level.
None of the platforms reviewed above solve grant cost allocation natively. The standard approach is: process payroll in your HR software, export payroll journal entries by department or cost center, and import those entries into your fund accounting system (QuickBooks Nonprofit, Sage Intacct, or Blackbaud Financial Edge). The platforms that make this easiest are Rippling and Paylocity, because their custom reporting and accounting integrations give you more control over how data is structured on export.
When evaluating any HR software, ask the vendor specifically: “Can I export payroll data broken down by employee and cost center in a format my accounting system can import directly?” If they cannot demonstrate that in a live demo, that is your answer.
The honest answer is that nonprofit HR software costs between $6 and $30 per employee per month depending on the platform and modules selected. That range is wide because “HR software” covers everything from payroll-only to full-suite HRIS with performance management, analytics, and benefits.
Here is a realistic monthly cost model for a 50-person nonprofit:
| Scenario | Platform | Estimated Monthly Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Payroll only | OnPay | $340/mo ($40 base + $6 x 50) |
| Payroll + HRIS | Gusto Plus | ~$590/mo ($40 base + ~$11 PEPM) |
| HRIS only (no payroll) | HR Partner | ~$195/mo (flat-rate band) |
| Full suite, mid-market | Paycor / Paylocity | Quote-only; get an itemized quote from each vendor |
| Full suite, large nonprofit | ADP Workforce Now | Quote-only; get an itemized quote from ADP directly |
Both Paycor/Paylocity and ADP Workforce Now are quote-only and do not publish per-employee pricing. Always request a fully itemized quote and ask what is not included in the base price before making any budget assumptions.
If you are heading into a full vendor evaluation, our HR software buying checklist gives you 75 questions to ask before signing anything. Use the payroll and compliance sections in particular before making a final call on any of these platforms.
Yes. 501(c)(3) nonprofits employ paid staff and are required to run payroll, withhold federal and state income taxes, and pay the employer’s share of Social Security and Medicare taxes. The key difference from for-profit payroll is that 501(c)(3) organizations are exempt from Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA) and may be exempt from state unemployment taxes depending on the state. Volunteers are not employees and are not on payroll, but they may receive expense reimbursements.
OnPay is the strongest option for most small nonprofits. It explicitly handles 501(c)(3) FUTA exemptions, prices at a flat $40 per month plus $6 per employee, and includes all core features without tiered upsells. Gusto is a close second and offers a slightly more polished HR experience alongside payroll. For organizations with under 20 employees and very limited budgets, either platform provides solid coverage at a predictable price.
BambooHR markets directly to nonprofits and has offered pricing accommodations to qualifying 501(c)(3) organizations, though it does not publish a formal nonprofit discount percentage. The process requires contacting their sales team directly with proof of nonprofit status. TechSoup has historically partnered with BambooHR as well, so check the TechSoup catalog before negotiating directly with BambooHR’s sales team.
A PEO co-employs your staff and handles payroll, benefits, and HR compliance on your behalf. You lose some control over benefits plans and HR policy, but you gain access to group health insurance rates and outsourced compliance. An HRIS is software you operate yourself. Nonprofits under 30 employees often find PEOs cheaper and simpler. Organizations above that threshold typically build their own HR stack because the loss of control and the per-employee PEO markup outweigh the convenience.
Yes. TechSoup is a nonprofit technology marketplace that negotiates donated or deeply discounted software licenses for verified 501(c)(3) organizations. ADP has historically offered products through TechSoup. The catalog changes frequently, so check TechSoup’s current HR and payroll listings before approaching any vendor directly. TechSoup eligibility requires IRS determination letter verification and an annual qualification process.
Any nonprofit that receives restricted grant funding needs its payroll data to connect to its fund accounting system. No HR software platform solves this natively. The practical approach is to use your HR platform’s payroll export and accounting integrations to push labor cost data into QuickBooks Nonprofit, Sage Intacct, or Blackbaud Financial Edge. Rippling and Paylocity offer the most flexible exports for this purpose among the platforms reviewed.
Most HRIS platforms are designed for employees, not volunteers. If volunteer management is a significant operational need, a dedicated volunteer management platform will serve you better than trying to force volunteers into an HRIS built for paid staff. VolunteerHub and Galaxy Digital are two purpose-built options in that category, though they are not evaluated in this guide alongside the core HR platforms above. HR Partner explicitly mentions volunteer tracking in its nonprofit positioning and is worth evaluating if you need basic volunteer records in the same system as employee records , it is the closest option among the platforms reviewed here.
The biggest mistake nonprofit HR buyers make is treating this as a price negotiation with a vendor they have already selected. Shortlist first by fit, then negotiate on price. If you are a 25-person advocacy nonprofit with one part-time operations manager, you need OnPay or HR Partner, not Paylocity. The wrong platform at a discount is still the wrong platform.
Start with the size and complexity of your payroll, not the number of HR features in the demo. Payroll is where nonprofits create real compliance risk, and it is where the platform matters most. Once you have the payroll question answered, layer on HRIS features. If your chosen payroll platform does not have the HR features you need, pair it with a lightweight HRIS rather than switching to an all-in-one that is not a fit.
Grant reporting requirements will shape your evaluation more than anything else if you receive restricted funding. Before signing any contract, run a test export from the demo environment and confirm that your accounting team can actually import it. That one step will save you a painful mid-year discovery about a platform you cannot use. Our HR software implementation checklist covers the data migration and integration validation steps worth completing before you go live on any of these platforms.